coding-conventions: Apply consistent security, performance, and accessibility standards across all recommendations. Use when reviewing code, designing features, or validating implementations. Cross-cutting skill for all agents.
Installation
Details
Usage
After installing, this skill will be available to your AI coding assistant.
Verify installation:
skills listSkill Instructions
name: coding-conventions description: Apply consistent security, performance, and accessibility standards across all recommendations. Use when reviewing code, designing features, or validating implementations. Cross-cutting skill for all agents.
Best Practices
A cross-cutting skill that enforces consistent security, performance, and quality standards across all agent recommendations. This skill provides actionable checklists aligned with industry standards.
When to Use
- Reviewing code for security vulnerabilities
- Validating performance characteristics of implementations
- Ensuring accessibility compliance in UI components
- Designing error handling strategies
- Auditing existing systems for quality gaps
Core Domains
Security
Covers common vulnerability prevention aligned with OWASP Top 10. Apply these checks to any code that handles user input, authentication, data storage, or external communications.
See: checklists/security-checklist.md
Performance
Covers optimization patterns for frontend, backend, and database operations. Apply these checks when performance is a concern or during code review.
See: checklists/performance-checklist.md
Accessibility
Covers WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance. Apply these checks to all user-facing components to ensure inclusive design.
See: checklists/accessibility-checklist.md
Error Handling Patterns
All agents should recommend these error handling approaches:
Pattern 1: Fail Fast at Boundaries
Validate inputs at system boundaries and fail immediately with clear error messages. Do not allow invalid data to propagate through the system.
// At API boundary
function handleRequest(input) {
const validation = validateInput(input);
if (!validation.valid) {
throw new ValidationError(validation.errors);
}
// Process validated input
}
Pattern 2: Specific Error Types
Create domain-specific error types that carry context about what failed and why. Generic errors lose valuable debugging information.
class PaymentDeclinedError extends Error {
constructor(reason, transactionId) {
super(`Payment declined: ${reason}`);
this.reason = reason;
this.transactionId = transactionId;
}
}
Pattern 3: User-Safe Messages
Never expose internal error details to users. Log full context internally, present sanitized messages externally.
try {
await processPayment(order);
} catch (error) {
logger.error('Payment failed', {
error,
orderId: order.id,
userId: user.id
});
throw new UserFacingError('Payment could not be processed. Please try again.');
}
Pattern 4: Graceful Degradation
When non-critical operations fail, degrade gracefully rather than failing entirely. Define what is critical vs. optional.
async function loadDashboard() {
const [userData, analytics, recommendations] = await Promise.allSettled([
fetchUserData(), // Critical - fail if missing
fetchAnalytics(), // Optional - show placeholder
fetchRecommendations() // Optional - hide section
]);
if (userData.status === 'rejected') {
throw new Error('Cannot load dashboard');
}
return {
user: userData.value,
analytics: analytics.value ?? null,
recommendations: recommendations.value ?? []
};
}
Pattern 5: Retry with Backoff
For transient failures (network, rate limits), implement exponential backoff with maximum attempts.
async function fetchWithRetry(url, maxAttempts = 3) {
for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= maxAttempts; attempt++) {
try {
return await fetch(url);
} catch (error) {
if (attempt === maxAttempts) throw error;
await sleep(Math.pow(2, attempt) * 100); // 200ms, 400ms, 800ms
}
}
}
Best Practices
- Apply security checks before performance optimization
- Make accessibility a default, not an afterthought
- Use checklists during code review, not just at the end
- Document exceptions to standards with rationale
- Automate checks where possible (linting, testing)
References
checklists/security-checklist.md- OWASP-aligned security checkschecklists/performance-checklist.md- Performance optimization checklistchecklists/accessibility-checklist.md- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance checklist
More by rsmdt
View allCoordinate multi-agent code review with specialized perspectives. Use when conducting code reviews, analyzing PRs, evaluating staged changes, or reviewing specific files. Handles security, performance, quality, and test coverage analysis with confidence scoring and actionable recommendations.
Manage git operations for spec-driven development. Use when creating branches for specs/features, generating commits, or creating PRs. Provides consistent git workflow across specify, implement, and refactor commands. Handles branch naming, commit messages, and PR descriptions based on spec context.
Detect divergence between specifications and implementation during development. Use during implementation phases to identify scope creep, missing features, contradictions, or extra work not in spec. Logs drift decisions to spec README.
user-research: User interview techniques, persona creation, journey mapping, and research synthesis patterns. Use when planning research studies, conducting interviews, creating personas, or translating research findings into actionable design recommendations.
