rigorous-reasoning
Triggers: conflict, disagreement, debate, ethical, controversial, pushback Prevents sycophantic reasoning through checklist-based analysis, categorical integrity, and evidence-following to uncomfortable conclusions. Triggers (conflict-based): disagreement, conflict, debate, ethical question, controversial claim, interpersonal analysis, competing values, adjudication, "who is right", moral dilemma, harm assessment Triggers (red-flag self-monitoring): "I agree that", "You're right", "Great point", "Absolutely", "That's a fair point", "I can see why", agreement without validation, softening conclusions, hedging without evidence, retracting under pressure Use when: analyzing conflicts or disagreements, evaluating ethical claims, adjudicating competing positions, noticing sycophantic thought patterns, making truth claims in contested territory DO NOT use when: routine implementation tasks with no contested claims DO NOT use when: simple factual questions with clear answers CRITICAL: This skill overrides default conversational tendencies toward agreement. Agreement requires validity, accuracy, or truth, not politeness.
Installation
Details
Usage
After installing, this skill will be available to your AI coding assistant.
Verify installation:
skills list